Welcome to
the forums at bobdunsire.com
bobdunsire.com forums bobdunsire.com forums
You can reset your password by going here. Be sure to try your current email and any email addresses you may have had in the past.
Otherwise please use the Contact Us link at the bottom of the forums. In order to help you, please provide the following info: Your Display Name from the old forum and any possible email addresses you would have used before. Without that info we cannot locate your account.


Go Back   Bob Dunsire Bagpipe Forums > Great Highland Bagpipe > Technique & Instrument
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Technique & Instrument Related to techniques, to the instrument, to the components, to maintenance.

Platinum Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2019, 02:32 PM   #1
Patrick McLaurin
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 5,687
Default Drone Volume in Old Recordings

When you listen to old recordings (not recordings of pipers who are now old, I'm talking as old as they get), the drones are very audible, especially the tenors.

http://www.tobarandualchais.co.uk/en...0Brown%20M.B.E.

http://tobarandualchais.co.uk/en/sea...20Bell%20Nicol

http://research.culturalequity.org/r...rId&sortBy=abc

I don't imagine they did a whole lot of multi-track mixing back then. Is it wrong to assume that there was one microphone? Where was it placed? I don't know. However, taking those recordings as representative samples, it would seem to me that drone volume has decreased, in general across highland piping, since these recordings were made, especially the tenors.

The drones are to provide a chordal backdrop to the chanter, and yet they fail to do so at lower volumes. Each chanter note should have a different timbre when played against the drones due to the interplay between the chanter and the drones' harmonic structure, provided the drones produce sufficient volume in their higher harmonics to be audible. Low A, C#, and E often sound very clear, whereas B, D, and F# can have very complex, almost electric sounds when played against drones with audible harmonics. In my experience, not to discount the bass drone, but I find the tenor volume very important. I would also like to emphasize that the electric sound is NOT buzzy. There are a few drone reeds on the market which are buzzy without the chanter ever sounding; I do not refer to this innate buzz that some reeds have.

What do you think?

My own theory appeals to the competitive advantage of quieter drones being less noticeably out of tune due to the lack of louder harmonics. At least, it works in the solo realm. For bands, a booming drone sound seems to be most desirable and impressive.
Patrick McLaurin is offline   Reply With Quote
Gold Sponsor
Old 08-24-2019, 02:41 PM   #2
CalumII
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London Town
Posts: 5,252
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

My understanding is that on the earliest acoustic recordings, the microphones could not pick up any drone sound above the chanter, so a second piper was employed to play drones only, pointing them directly into the mic, but that's before these.



On the field recorders, the microphones are very sensitive, as they had to pick up everything in the room, not just the person speaking into them.



There may well be something to your theory - but actually I think it is likely that chanters (and reeds) have gotten louder than vice versa.
CalumII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2019, 05:01 PM   #3
MacTallanambeann
Forum Silver Medal
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ceann Loch Goibhle
Posts: 333
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

Would our modern set-up techniques with adjustments for 'air economy' have a part to play in volume?
MacTallanambeann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2019, 07:04 PM   #4
MichiganGaidar
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 149
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacTallanambeann View Post
Would our modern set-up techniques with adjustments for 'air economy' have a part to play in volume?
My gaidi all say "no". I'd pin it on increasingly loud and strong chanter reeds, and chanter designs which emphasize volume and projection, without corresponding changes in drones or drone reeds.
MichiganGaidar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2019, 08:22 AM   #5
bob864
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 9,362
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

I have a chanter that dates from the 1950s or 1960s and it's not as loud as a modern chanter, so that's at least one factor. As previously mentioned, chanter reeds are probably louder too, but I don't have any reeds that are that old :-)

The recordings in the link are all from the 1950s. They were probably made on a mono reel-to-reel deck. There's no telling what kind of microphone was used, but microphone placement has a dramatic impact on the recording.

The room sounds really nice, btw. It's a fairly large room. The fact that the room is clearly heard tells us something about microphone placement. Assuming it's a single microphone, it's a fair distance from the instrument. Bass travels better over distance than treble. Also, it sounds like the piper is stationary, which suggests Mr. Lorimer might have worked with him to optimize the sound.

We also don't know how the recordings were transferred to digital. The machine itself could have colored the sound, and the person who did the transfer might have used any number of digital restoration techniques, including EQ.
__________________
bob864 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2019, 08:50 AM   #6
Patrick McLaurin
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 5,687
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

Here is my attempt at capturing the various timbres of the notes referenced in my initial post. The reel at the end was for fun, please ignore my sloppy birls, especially those that start on B straight to low G (not easy!).

http://www.patrickmclaurin.com/wordp...llows_tail.mp3
Patrick McLaurin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2019, 01:38 PM   #7
bob864
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 9,362
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick McLaurin View Post
Here is my attempt at capturing the various timbres of the notes referenced in my initial post.
Your recording is brighter and crisper. Recordings made in the 1950s were never that bright or crisp. If you have Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) software there are plugins that can emulate the hardware of days gone by. If not, you could EQ off some of the brightness and you'd be closer.
__________________
bob864 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2019, 02:04 PM   #8
Patrick McLaurin
Holy smoking keyboard!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 5,687
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

I am not trying to emulate the recordings, save for what I might deduce about relative drone volume to the chanter.

Regarding the timbre of the notes that my recording attempts to show, I ascribe that phenomenon to drones that are louder than what I feel is average today; today’s average volume being quieter than what these past recordings indicate, in my opinion.

I hope that is clearer.
Patrick McLaurin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2019, 03:48 PM   #9
DapperDan
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 119
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

I don't think the drones are too loud .. maybe there's echo because it's indoors? Probably would have sounded different in the open air. Maybe also the cane reeds are set a bit open, to reduce the chance of one locking up during a recording.
I like the vintage recordings. I certainly wasn't around back then, so I wonder if you could get a sound like Robert Brown, now. If you play a skin bag, cane reeds, and a low-pitch wooden chanter. I suspect some of the sound is the recording technology.
I like what Patrick is doing, maybe that's more like what the pipes actually sounded like (except the pitch) in person.
DapperDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2019, 10:04 AM   #10
Dan Bell
Forum Clasp
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 857
Default Re: Drone Volume in Old Recordings

We don't have any recordings of Bob Brown's sound that are really accurate enough to let us try to reproduce it. Furthermore, for most of the history of recorded sound, recordings have been mastered to make the performers sound as good as possible, which isn't always the same thing as capturing them in the highest possible fidelity.
Dan Bell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Silver Sponsor

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 AM.